![]() There is likely another reason behind the move: money. We’re hoping to start a conversation about how a new type of company can make this happen.” We think there are lots of cities that could benefit from this kind of bus tech. “We’re based in London, we know London,” says Yusuf. (Uber famously, favours a strategy for ‘regulatory arbitrage’ becoming so popular with users that cities change their laws.) “Citymapper has some very interesting ideas and we’re in discussion with them about how they might work in London.”Ĭitymapper’s approach is unusual: many tech companies, particularly in the transport space, have been resistant to working with regulators. “We are very much open to new ideas and are actively engaging tech companies and innovators on some of the challenges facing the city,” says Michael Hurwitz, director of transport innovation at TFL. Read more: Citymapper's route for success “One of the things we're really excited about trying to do is a more reactive bus, something we call Demand Response, which responds more to the needs of people.” Under current frameworks, that’s not permitted. “We’d love to see existing frameworks expanding, so we can do more interesting things,” says Yusuf. ![]() CMX1 will be free for passengers, in part because charging would require a license. But there’s currently no framework in place that would permit flexible buses to really change how buses operate will require a change in regulation. Transport For London already issues licenses for private buses – for example, for sightseeing tours – and has embraced open data. There lies Citymapper’s biggest challenge: regulation. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |